<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony apologizes, withdraws uninstaller, not before shooting self in foot</title>
	<link>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48</link>
	<description>All about egregiously anti-customer behavior by everyone's favorite BigCo.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sony apologizes, withdraws uninstaller, not before shooting self in foot by: Runescape Money Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-135961</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2007 15:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-135961</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Runescape Money Blog&lt;/strong&gt;

I have written a followup to this on my blog.  Feel free to check it out if interested. -Louis--- This post was created by Comment Poster.  Want to post thousands of comments to blogs instantly and increase your visitors exponentially?  Check it out he...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Runescape Money Blog</strong></p>
	<p>I have written a followup to this on my blog.  Feel free to check it out if interested. -Louis&#8212; This post was created by Comment Poster.  Want to post thousands of comments to blogs instantly and increase your visitors exponentially?  Check it out he&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sony apologizes, withdraws uninstaller, not before shooting self in foot by: Bill Gates</title>
		<link>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-564</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-564</guid>
					<description>Keep it up my underlings, thanks for helping bring down Sony so my Xbox will be successful.

You'll receive a discount on Windows in the mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Keep it up my underlings, thanks for helping bring down Sony so my Xbox will be successful.</p>
	<p>You&#8217;ll receive a discount on Windows in the mail.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sony apologizes, withdraws uninstaller, not before shooting self in foot by: Dave sez Boycotting Sony is not Enough</title>
		<link>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-382</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2005 14:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-382</guid>
					<description>OK, boycotting Sony is a good idea, but it's not enough.
As many have noted, Sony can just wipe the 55 titles,
ignore the complaints (apparently from less than 1% of
it's customers) and carry on developing new dirty tricks.
This is apparently what is happening.

However, there's a better (more effective) way to operate
in this fast-wired world.  Boycott organizations which are
responsive, e.g., Amazon.  Yeah, strange idea, but read on.
Simply send an e-mail to Amazon (comment/suggestion
page) saying that you will not purchase anything through
Amazon until they stop carrying *any* Sony products.
Then do that.  It's a bitter pill to swallow, since Amazon is
very convenient ... but there are always alternatives.  This
is a great time to do it, right in the middle of the Xmas
buying season.  If a lot of folks did this, Amazon would
have to comply with our demand or suffer greatly ... and
this could happen in just a week or two!  Having Amazon
drop all Sony products would be something that Sony
might actually feel [or maybe not, is Sony so big that they
can ignore the loss of Amazon outlet?]

BTW, there are other rationalizations for boycotting
Amazon over the Sony CD issue.  For one, we (I, anyway)
was sold a poisoned product, and Amazon is the entity
who sold it to me.  Granted, Amazon is not legally
responsible, and they are treating the CDs as &quot;defective&quot;
products.  But they sold the poison.  Also BTW, I'm not
personally against Amazon (or historically, Sony), and I
will miss using their services/products.  But I do not trust
Sony any longer and it's not just a boycott issue ... I do
not want products from a manufacturer that treats it's
customers as adversaries.  Their products are not welcome
in my house (or computer) any longer.  Same sort of thing
goes for Amazon, except that dropping the customer-
adversarial Sony brand from their catalog would restore
my trust in Amazon, i.e., convince me that they are on
my side, and I'd be happy to return as a loyal customer.

Well, that's my solution.

Dave.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>OK, boycotting Sony is a good idea, but it&#8217;s not enough.<br />
As many have noted, Sony can just wipe the 55 titles,<br />
ignore the complaints (apparently from less than 1% of<br />
it&#8217;s customers) and carry on developing new dirty tricks.<br />
This is apparently what is happening.</p>
	<p>However, there&#8217;s a better (more effective) way to operate<br />
in this fast-wired world.  Boycott organizations which are<br />
responsive, e.g., Amazon.  Yeah, strange idea, but read on.<br />
Simply send an e-mail to Amazon (comment/suggestion<br />
page) saying that you will not purchase anything through<br />
Amazon until they stop carrying *any* Sony products.<br />
Then do that.  It&#8217;s a bitter pill to swallow, since Amazon is<br />
very convenient &#8230; but there are always alternatives.  This<br />
is a great time to do it, right in the middle of the Xmas<br />
buying season.  If a lot of folks did this, Amazon would<br />
have to comply with our demand or suffer greatly &#8230; and<br />
this could happen in just a week or two!  Having Amazon<br />
drop all Sony products would be something that Sony<br />
might actually feel [or maybe not, is Sony so big that they<br />
can ignore the loss of Amazon outlet?]</p>
	<p>BTW, there are other rationalizations for boycotting<br />
Amazon over the Sony CD issue.  For one, we (I, anyway)<br />
was sold a poisoned product, and Amazon is the entity<br />
who sold it to me.  Granted, Amazon is not legally<br />
responsible, and they are treating the CDs as &#8220;defective&#8221;<br />
products.  But they sold the poison.  Also BTW, I&#8217;m not<br />
personally against Amazon (or historically, Sony), and I<br />
will miss using their services/products.  But I do not trust<br />
Sony any longer and it&#8217;s not just a boycott issue &#8230; I do<br />
not want products from a manufacturer that treats it&#8217;s<br />
customers as adversaries.  Their products are not welcome<br />
in my house (or computer) any longer.  Same sort of thing<br />
goes for Amazon, except that dropping the customer-<br />
adversarial Sony brand from their catalog would restore<br />
my trust in Amazon, i.e., convince me that they are on<br />
my side, and I&#8217;d be happy to return as a loyal customer.</p>
	<p>Well, that&#8217;s my solution.</p>
	<p>Dave.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sony apologizes, withdraws uninstaller, not before shooting self in foot by: Thankful Reader</title>
		<link>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-260</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 16:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-260</guid>
					<description>Strange. Why is it that most of the artist are minor &quot;Adult&quot; artist. Things that make you go MMMMMM.

I would wonder why that are so intentent on &quot;protecting&quot; the low volume titles with an older audience which would anyway be less likely to &quot;share&quot; the music. Was it a dry run? Was it tried here because the target users would be less likely to notice? Was it because the targets would be less likely to have things worth seeing on their computers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Strange. Why is it that most of the artist are minor &#8220;Adult&#8221; artist. Things that make you go MMMMMM.</p>
	<p>I would wonder why that are so intentent on &#8220;protecting&#8221; the low volume titles with an older audience which would anyway be less likely to &#8220;share&#8221; the music. Was it a dry run? Was it tried here because the target users would be less likely to notice? Was it because the targets would be less likely to have things worth seeing on their computers?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sony apologizes, withdraws uninstaller, not before shooting self in foot by: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-244</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-244</guid>
					<description>Luckily most of the artists in the list are shit!

Seriously though, Sony needs to go back to basics. I have been harping on for yonks now about Sony cutting corners over the years. They have the ability to &quot;make&quot; good products and they have a history of a good brand that generally people used to really like (Walkman/Playstation/etc).

Recent Sony actions seem to be a bit of a WTF. I have been keeping a public log of Sony's MP3 player debarkle, &quot;The Cracking Buttons&quot; issue, on my website. The list keeps growing!

Regarding this latest faux pas, Sony BMG's mistakes bring home just how desperate traditional music distribution is getting (across the board), and how hard &quot;they&quot; (with RIAA as their rotweiler) are prepared to clasp onto their dwindling market, that just will not refuse to keep slipping away from them. They need to learn, as do the artists and consumers, that we don't need them anymore. Traditional marketing sells &quot;pop-pap&quot; only to little kids - no names mentioned....&quot;cough.... Spice..G...Girls... Boy...Zzzone... cough&quot;. Quality music sells itself. CDs can always be copied. Analogue output to soundcard - No Autorun and no rootkits in that configuration people.

I hope there share price hits them where it hurts. Boy you gotta love free market economics.

Live by the sword, die by the sword.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Luckily most of the artists in the list are shit!</p>
	<p>Seriously though, Sony needs to go back to basics. I have been harping on for yonks now about Sony cutting corners over the years. They have the ability to &#8220;make&#8221; good products and they have a history of a good brand that generally people used to really like (Walkman/Playstation/etc).</p>
	<p>Recent Sony actions seem to be a bit of a WTF. I have been keeping a public log of Sony&#8217;s MP3 player debarkle, &#8220;The Cracking Buttons&#8221; issue, on my website. The list keeps growing!</p>
	<p>Regarding this latest faux pas, Sony BMG&#8217;s mistakes bring home just how desperate traditional music distribution is getting (across the board), and how hard &#8220;they&#8221; (with RIAA as their rotweiler) are prepared to clasp onto their dwindling market, that just will not refuse to keep slipping away from them. They need to learn, as do the artists and consumers, that we don&#8217;t need them anymore. Traditional marketing sells &#8220;pop-pap&#8221; only to little kids - no names mentioned&#8230;.&#8221;cough&#8230;. Spice..G&#8230;Girls&#8230; Boy&#8230;Zzzone&#8230; cough&#8221;. Quality music sells itself. CDs can always be copied. Analogue output to soundcard - No Autorun and no rootkits in that configuration people.</p>
	<p>I hope there share price hits them where it hurts. Boy you gotta love free market economics.</p>
	<p>Live by the sword, die by the sword.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sony apologizes, withdraws uninstaller, not before shooting self in foot by: My Self</title>
		<link>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-242</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-242</guid>
					<description>It was about time for Sony to release the complete list.

http://cp.sonybmg.com/xcp/english/titles.html

My favorite is #5 : a CD called &quot;Suspicious Activity?&quot; by a group called &quot;The Bad Plus&quot;.

Google it and see cover art for this CD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>It was about time for Sony to release the complete list.</p>
	<p><a href='http://cp.sonybmg.com/xcp/english/titles.html' rel='nofollow'>http://cp.sonybmg.com/xcp/english/titles.html</a></p>
	<p>My favorite is #5 : a CD called &#8220;Suspicious Activity?&#8221; by a group called &#8220;The Bad Plus&#8221;.</p>
	<p>Google it and see cover art for this CD.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sony apologizes, withdraws uninstaller, not before shooting self in foot by: Alexander Trauzzi</title>
		<link>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-226</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-226</guid>
					<description>I would love to see Sony brought to justice for their behaviour in the market.  There are things even before this that I think warrants some kind of reprimand.

They are a moraless company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I would love to see Sony brought to justice for their behaviour in the market.  There are things even before this that I think warrants some kind of reprimand.</p>
	<p>They are a moraless company.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sony apologizes, withdraws uninstaller, not before shooting self in foot by: Dennis M. Yates</title>
		<link>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-192</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 20:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-192</guid>
					<description>The Wired article stated that Sony would probably not be prosecuted.  Who can we write to to try to get them brought to justice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The Wired article stated that Sony would probably not be prosecuted.  Who can we write to to try to get them brought to justice?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sony apologizes, withdraws uninstaller, not before shooting self in foot by: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-191</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 20:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-191</guid>
					<description>Sony promotes XCP not recalling it
November 18th, 2005 
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/051116/nyw143.html?.v=31
Press Release Source: Columbia Records 

Neil Diamond’s ‘12 Songs’ Makes Chart History as Artist’s First-Ever Top 10 Debut &amp;#38; First Top 10 Album in 13 Years
Wednesday November 16, 2:45 pm ET  

Released on November 8, with first true week’s sales of 92,705, according to SoundScan, 12 Songs is providing the strongest opening week’s numbers of Neil’s career.

I put this very simple question to SonyBMG:

Why are you still selling the Number 4 chart album on Billboard on your own web site?

Who is speaking for the 92,705 customers (Less 4,057 Digital Purchases) who have purchased this CD.? Why do you continue even on your own website to still be offering this CD for sale from these locations?

My full 1750 post of the above and everything else is at
http://netweb.wordpress.com/2005/11/18/sony-promotes-xcp-not-recalling-it/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sony promotes XCP not recalling it<br />
November 18th, 2005<br />
<a href='http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/051116/nyw143.html?.v=31' rel='nofollow'>http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/051116/nyw143.html?.v=31</a><br />
Press Release Source: Columbia Records </p>
	<p>Neil Diamond’s ‘12 Songs’ Makes Chart History as Artist’s First-Ever Top 10 Debut &amp; First Top 10 Album in 13 Years<br />
Wednesday November 16, 2:45 pm ET  </p>
	<p>Released on November 8, with first true week’s sales of 92,705, according to SoundScan, 12 Songs is providing the strongest opening week’s numbers of Neil’s career.</p>
	<p>I put this very simple question to SonyBMG:</p>
	<p>Why are you still selling the Number 4 chart album on Billboard on your own web site?</p>
	<p>Who is speaking for the 92,705 customers (Less 4,057 Digital Purchases) who have purchased this CD.? Why do you continue even on your own website to still be offering this CD for sale from these locations?</p>
	<p>My full 1750 post of the above and everything else is at<br />
<a href='http://netweb.wordpress.com/2005/11/18/sony-promotes-xcp-not-recalling-it/' rel='nofollow'>http://netweb.wordpress.com/2005/11/18/sony-promotes-xcp-not-recalling-it/</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Sony apologizes, withdraws uninstaller, not before shooting self in foot by: Steve U.K.</title>
		<link>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-190</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 20:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.boycottsony.us/?p=48#comment-190</guid>
					<description>Let's face it, multinational companies the size of Sony have the financial power to control a government or governments let alone a bunch of insignificant plebs, oh sorry 'customers'...This has certainly been apparent with the lack of mainsteam media coverage of an internet security event such as this! A little hacker from the backwoods invading 20,000 pc's would have got more publicity &amp;#38; headlines, I dare say they would also have been 'fast tracked' through the legal system, had all equipment confiscated, would be banned from owning or using a computer for years &amp;#38; would now be doing some time in jail...Right now I think Sony are despicable for not doing much more to make the 'customers' more aware of this problem they created &amp;#38; feel governments are not doing enough to make them do it!...I also find it a concern that First 4 internet are still advertising their crap product too! as they seem to be nothing more than legalized hackers, malicious software &amp;#38; virus writers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Let&#8217;s face it, multinational companies the size of Sony have the financial power to control a government or governments let alone a bunch of insignificant plebs, oh sorry &#8216;customers&#8217;&#8230;This has certainly been apparent with the lack of mainsteam media coverage of an internet security event such as this! A little hacker from the backwoods invading 20,000 pc&#8217;s would have got more publicity &amp; headlines, I dare say they would also have been &#8216;fast tracked&#8217; through the legal system, had all equipment confiscated, would be banned from owning or using a computer for years &amp; would now be doing some time in jail&#8230;Right now I think Sony are despicable for not doing much more to make the &#8216;customers&#8217; more aware of this problem they created &amp; feel governments are not doing enough to make them do it!&#8230;I also find it a concern that First 4 internet are still advertising their crap product too! as they seem to be nothing more than legalized hackers, malicious software &amp; virus writers!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
